<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No More Microsoft Word Headaches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/</link>
	<description>Finally... A CMS Built For Web Designers and Entrepreneurs</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colyn</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>Colyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 23:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>"Clients do what they do...."

You are correct, but where do you draw the line on usability? At some point you have to say to yourself, if my client can spend time and/or money on learning to use Microsoft Word, then they can spend a day figuring out how to use my CMS.

When I've approached clients with the idea of building them a CMS so that they can save money in the long run on maintenance costs, the usual reply is that they don't have the time or inclination to learn another application. My usual response is that if they can use Word, they can use my CMS. Somehow that's usually never a persuasive enough argument for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Clients do what they do&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are correct, but where do you draw the line on usability? At some point you have to say to yourself, if my client can spend time and/or money on learning to use Microsoft Word, then they can spend a day figuring out how to use my CMS.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;ve approached clients with the idea of building them a CMS so that they can save money in the long run on maintenance costs, the usual reply is that they don&#8217;t have the time or inclination to learn another application. My usual response is that if they can use Word, they can use my CMS. Somehow that&#8217;s usually never a persuasive enough argument for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wcardinal</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>wcardinal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-915</guid>
		<description>It would be great if you could share this cleanup code.  I would love to see what you have done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if you could share this cleanup code.  I would love to see what you have done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackborn</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>jackborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-607</guid>
		<description>I've tried TYPO3.  Problem is its complexity.  That said, you've obviously found it to be very useful so nothing on this blog should (or would) deter you from using it.  No doubt, it's very powerful.  But for the typical designer/entrepreneur I think it's got too steep a learning curve.  It took me a solid afternoon to start to comprehend how to create a template.

The other problem I had was that there is a strict prohibition against changing the login screen so that Typo3 doesn't appear.

Yet another issue is handing this kind of complex system over to a business owner that you've designed the site for.  Whether it's Drupal, or Typo3, if it takes web-geeks a while to figure out, just imagine how long it takes to train a non-techie.

As I said, Typo3 is mature and loved by many.  For some it's perfect.  I found it limiting for the reasons I stated above.

But for those that master it and don't need to hand it over to a client, it is a powerful tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried TYPO3.  Problem is its complexity.  That said, you&#8217;ve obviously found it to be very useful so nothing on this blog should (or would) deter you from using it.  No doubt, it&#8217;s very powerful.  But for the typical designer/entrepreneur I think it&#8217;s got too steep a learning curve.  It took me a solid afternoon to start to comprehend how to create a template.</p>
<p>The other problem I had was that there is a strict prohibition against changing the login screen so that Typo3 doesn&#8217;t appear.</p>
<p>Yet another issue is handing this kind of complex system over to a business owner that you&#8217;ve designed the site for.  Whether it&#8217;s Drupal, or Typo3, if it takes web-geeks a while to figure out, just imagine how long it takes to train a non-techie.</p>
<p>As I said, Typo3 is mature and loved by many.  For some it&#8217;s perfect.  I found it limiting for the reasons I stated above.</p>
<p>But for those that master it and don&#8217;t need to hand it over to a client, it is a powerful tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Derencius</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Derencius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-606</guid>
		<description>your project is nice, but I'd recommend you take look on TYPO3 CMS, all features I've saw here in your blog you can get easly with TYPO3. It's a worth look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your project is nice, but I&#8217;d recommend you take look on TYPO3 CMS, all features I&#8217;ve saw here in your blog you can get easly with TYPO3. It&#8217;s a worth look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackborn</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>jackborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-318</guid>
		<description>I don't think it will be kept private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it will be kept private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Phipps</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>So the obvious question is:  Will this MS Word cleanup code be kept private?  Or is this something that you might consider discussing publicly?  I've got another system that I'd LOVE to implement this on, but it's not a good fit for the entire CMS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the obvious question is:  Will this MS Word cleanup code be kept private?  Or is this something that you might consider discussing publicly?  I&#8217;ve got another system that I&#8217;d LOVE to implement this on, but it&#8217;s not a good fit for the entire CMS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackborn</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>jackborn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Funzy,

Great suggestion... I did not know about that one.

However... I still think the server side cleaning of the garbage is useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funzy,</p>
<p>Great suggestion&#8230; I did not know about that one.</p>
<p>However&#8230; I still think the server side cleaning of the garbage is useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funzy</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Funzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>In the FCKeditor you use, you can also turn 
FCKConfig.ForcePasteAsPlainText	= false ;

  or

FCKConfig.AutoDetectPasteFromWord = true ;

to true and then it happens live!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the FCKeditor you use, you can also turn<br />
FCKConfig.ForcePasteAsPlainText	= false ;</p>
<p>  or</p>
<p>FCKConfig.AutoDetectPasteFromWord = true ;</p>
<p>to true and then it happens live!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmslaunch.com/13/no-more-microsoft-word-headaches/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>That's awesome!  It's truly the coolest thing I've seen today - well in a couple days at least.  I'm looking forward to the product.

BTW, if you run your FLV through the FLV metadata injector, your timeline scrollbar should work.

The program is here:  http://www.buraks.com/flvmdi/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s awesome!  It&#8217;s truly the coolest thing I&#8217;ve seen today - well in a couple days at least.  I&#8217;m looking forward to the product.</p>
<p>BTW, if you run your FLV through the FLV metadata injector, your timeline scrollbar should work.</p>
<p>The program is here:  <a href="http://www.buraks.com/flvmdi/" rel="nofollow">http://www.buraks.com/flvmdi/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
